Current:Home > Contact-usMississippi Supreme Court won’t remove Brett Favre from lawsuit in welfare fraud case-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Mississippi Supreme Court won’t remove Brett Favre from lawsuit in welfare fraud case
View Date:2024-12-24 07:20:32
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) – The Mississippi Supreme Court says it will not remove NFL Hall of Famer Brett Favre as a defendant in a civil lawsuit that seeks to recover millions of dollars of misspent welfare money meant to help some of the poorest people in the United States.
A panel of three justices issued a brief ruling Wednesday, denying an appeal from Favre.
His attorneys said in written arguments in May that the Mississippi Department of Human Services is making “utterly meritless” legal arguments in suing the retired quarterback.
On April 24, Hinds County Circuit Judge Faye Peterson denied Favre’s request to be removed from the lawsuit, which has more than three dozen people or businesses as defendants. Favre asked the Supreme Court to overturn Peterson’s decision.
Millions of federal welfare dollars for low-income Mississippi residents were squandered on projects supported by wealthy or well-connected people from 2016 to 2019, prosecutors say.
The Department of Human Services’ lawsuit, filed in 2022, says money from the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program was improperly spent, including on projects Favre supported: $5 million for a volleyball arena at the university he attended and where Favre’s daughter played the sport, and $1.7 million toward development of a concussion treatment drug.
No criminal charges have been brought against Favre, although a former department director and other people have pleaded guilty to their part in the misspending.
In their filing to the state Supreme Court, Favre’s attorneys argued that Department of Human Services officials and Nancy New, who directed a nonprofit organization with Human Services contracts, “concocted and carried out the scheme” to direct welfare money toward a volleyball center, and that Favre was not part of the effort.
Attorneys for the state responded that Favre took $1.1 million in TANF money from Nancy New “for speeches he never made.”
“Favre repaid that, but he has neither repaid the $1.7 million he arranged for his drug company, Prevacus, to receive in exchange for giving Nancy New stock, nor the $5 million he orchestrated the USM Athletic Department to receive for a volleyball facility,” the state attorneys wrote.
Favre’s attorneys argued the Department of Human Services is suing the NFL Hall of Famer to deflect from the department’s own role in allowing fraud, and they filed multiple sets of papers seeking to have him dismissed from the suit.
State attorneys wrote in March that Favre’s attorneys had given the court “a long press release” rather than legal arguments in trying to get him out of the lawsuit. The state attorneys wrote in May that the Mississippi Supreme Court does not grant appeals “based on whether a defendant is famous, or on speculations about the plaintiff’s motives, or on fact disputes.”
veryGood! (11114)
Related
- Black women notch historic Senate wins in an election year defined by potential firsts
- What went wrong at Silicon Valley Bank? The Fed is set to release a postmortem report
- He 'Proved Mike Wrong.' Now he's claiming his $5 million
- Jake Bongiovi Bonds With Fiancée Millie Bobby Brown's Family During NYC Outing
- Where is 'College GameDay' for Week 12? Location, what to know for ESPN show
- Biden Administration Stops Short of Electric Vehicle Mandates for Trucks
- Facebook users can apply for their portion of a $725 million lawsuit settlement
- Pete Davidson Admits His Mom Defended Him on Twitter From Burner Account
- Melissa Gilbert recalls 'painful' final moment with 'Little House' co-star Michael Landon
- Noah Cyrus Shares How Haters Criticizing Her Engagement Reminds Her of Being Suicidal at Age 11
Ranking
- Lululemon, Disney partner for 34-piece collection and campaign: 'A dream collaboration'
- Warming Trends: How Hairdressers Are Mobilizing to Counter Climate Change, Plus Polar Bears in Greenland and the ‘Sounds of the Ocean’
- Inside Clean Energy: Here’s What the 2021 Elections Tell Us About the Politics of Clean Energy
- Step up Your Fashion With the Top 17 Trending Amazon Styles Right Now
- Wildfires burn on both coasts. Is climate change to blame?
- Contact is lost with a Japanese spacecraft attempting to land on the moon
- Prince William got a 'very large sum' in a Murdoch settlement in 2020
- The U.K. blocks Microsoft's $69 billion deal to buy game giant Activision Blizzard
Recommendation
-
Japan to resume V-22 flights after inquiry finds pilot error caused accident
-
Senate Votes to Ratify the Kigali Amendment, Joining 137 Nations in an Effort to Curb Global Warming
-
A tech billionaire goes missing in China
-
Fired Tucker Carlson producer: Misogyny and bullying 'trickles down from the top'
-
CFP bracket prediction: SEC adds a fifth team to field while a Big Ten unbeaten falls out
-
Charlie Sheen and Denise Richards’ Daughter Sami Shares Her Riskiest OnlyFans Photo Yet in Sheer Top
-
Warming Trends: Butterflies Bounce Back, Growing Up Gay Amid High Plains Oil, Art Focuses on Plastic Production
-
Plagued by Daily Blackouts, Puerto Ricans Are Calling for an Energy Revolution. Will the Biden Administration Listen?